www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/1 ... wheel.html
California rules on requiring a driver within the driverless cars at all times...
Alasdair
step back for autonomous cars?
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:03 pm
Re: step back for autonomous cars?
So presumably, that means the 'driver' would have to remain awake, and focused on the driving task, ready to take over, wouldn't they...?
Which means the whole idea of a driverless car is completely wasted.
Which means the whole idea of a driverless car is completely wasted.
Re: step back for autonomous cars?
Actually, if you think about it, especially during development, that's not the problem.
The problem is whether the attending driver is sufficiently aware and involved to take over swiftly and appropriately.
The problem is whether the attending driver is sufficiently aware and involved to take over swiftly and appropriately.
Your 'standard' is how you drive alone, not how you drive during a test.
Re: step back for autonomous cars?
Horse wrote:sufficiently aware and involved to take over swiftly and appropriately.
I think there is sufficient evidence to say that we know the answer to this one.
there is only the road, nothing but the road ...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests